US preparing another false flag chemical attack in Syria?

The US media reports that the US government suspects the Syrian regime is planning another chemical weapons attack.

Think about this claim.

How would the USA know to make the claim? It is an announcement without evidence, without a credible source. Just like many other claims by the US establishment and their media.

Since the Russians claimed they had destroyed all chemical weapons held by the Syrian regime (chemicals in rebel held areas were not destroyed), every time there has been a chemical attack, the US and its allies have used it to intensify their attack on the Assad regime. And because the Assad regime made the weapons and used them before, it is easy to believe they will do so again. Yet the situation has changed and so the consequences of using chemical weapons in Syria.

A recent chemical attack occurred within range of anti regime rebels, who have used chemical weapons in the past. The US military used cruise missiles to attack a Syrian airfield they said was where the chemical attacks were launched from. Russia and Syria has invited the US to send technicians to detect chemicals at the airfield and the site of the attack, but the US refused. Wouldn’t they want to know the truth of the attack? Not if they used it as a false flag attack.

A false flag is an attack one side tries to blame on the enemy by attempting to make it appear they are at fault. False flag attacks are often the worst crimes committed in wars, because the attacker is trying to make their enemy appear as evil as possible. They are also killing the citizens of their enemy and have even less concern for their lives than the lives of their own citizens.

Consider the possibility that the USA is preparing citizens for a false flag attack, so that they can be enraged when the US media blames it on the Assad regime, and gain blind support for increased military engagement.

You say the USA government would not do such an evil thing. Yet they have a long and consistent history of just that kind of evil. The US establishment do not value the lives of citizens, not even US citizens. Their constant hypocrisy exposes this.

This is the same USA that nuked 2 Japanese cities after the Japanese military had already been almost completely defeated. They more recently used depleted uranium in the middle east – that still sickens citizens today – as expected in advance. The USA continues to use chemical weapons like white phosphorous. Can you say that the US military isn’t capable of a false flag?

This is the same USA that continues to provide weapons to anti Assad rebel groups, knowing for years that many weapons will end up with ISIS – yet continues supplying weapons without pause. The USA knowingly supplies ISIS with weapons, while saying it is the enemy. Can you say that the US military isn’t capable of a false flag?

This is the same USA that has planned for decades the overthrow of the Syrian regime – not for the benefit of the Syrian people – but for the benefit of controlling regional hydrocarbon resources.

I suspect another false flag, a setup attack.

This is not a pro Syrian or pro Russian claim. It is an anti-establishment claim.

So, when the establishment controlled mass media tries to press your buttons, tries to wind you up like a toy soldier, realize what they are doing and don’t give them your anger as energy to feed their power. Don’t share their propaganda, but voice your suspicion.

Advertisements
US preparing another false flag chemical attack in Syria?

Kathy Griffin is the bully

Kathy Griffin a a professional bully. SHe makes a living out of trying to offend in a humorous way.

Its bullying.

Now she is claiming that she is being bullied by the Trump family.

She seems crazy. Did she forget that she posted a photo of her re-enacting the murder of a Trump family member. Thats extreme bullying!

Now her response os to play the victim. She isnt owning her own acts. This is really crazy. She has offended and disgusted millions of people, and she doesnt care about that. This is the kind of behavior that i assocate with psychopaths. Psychopaths simply are incapable of admitting fault, and will try to bluff their way out of the consequences of doing really bad things.

Will Kathy Griffin admit defeat, and accept that she is the cause of the consequences of her actions, or will she find a way to preserve her psycopathic mindset? Wait and see.

 

Kathy Griffin is the bully

WannaCrypt vs Ebola

Just like the African Ebola scare, WannaCypt was also promoted as an extremely immediate and dangerous threat in the mass media.

Both of these events turned out to not be the threat that the mass media claimed they were. Then the political benefits of these events came out.

FEAR. And blaming a particular group of people, in order to demonize them.

In the case of Ebola, everyone was told to be afraid of travelers and foreigners. Political demonization of travelers allowed increased security measures to be accepted by citizens. The mass media made a huge deal about it and it was extremely suspicious.

The long term strategy is to use a series of these events to wear down the compassion of citizens. This strategy is thousands of years old and as successful as ever due to governement education and the mass media keeping citizens ignorant.

In the case of WannaCrypt, everyone is being told to be careful where they browse, to not trust any alternative sources and website. Its a kind of censorship. Also, the mass media is being used to try to blame the ransomware on North Korea. Thats another giveaway that WannaCrypt is likely a political event, not an organised crime event.

The biggest giveaway of establishment operations is the mass media coverage. The mass media is totally controlled by the establishment. Every big noews story in the mass media is a concerted effort to increase the power of the establishment or attack an enemy of the establishment.

The greatest enemy of the establishment is citizen awareness. It isnt the duty of citizens to be suspicious of the establishment and seek to know what crimes they are up to – but it is the only way to avoid going down the path to symbolic slavery.

 

WannaCrypt vs Ebola

The real problem with North Korea

The mass media continually focuses on the threw north Korea poses to other nations. But it isn’t a real threat.
North Koreas strategy is well known and well understood. Their regime survives by making trouble for the west, to suit China, their sponsor. As soon as north Korea actually carries out any of their threats, they will be militarily defeated and their regime ends. Everyone knows it and so do they. The war industry also benefits from it, as military standoffs punctuated by regular minor conflicts and proxy wars, benefit the war profiteers. Full scale war doesn’t benefit war profiteers because regimes cannot be preserved.

The real problem is the imprisonment and exploitation of the powerless north Korean people. Their freedom and lives are sacrificed by the regimes that benefit from the standoff: China, USA, Russia and north Korea.

It is always the establishment that is most responsible for the suffering of people.

The real problem with North Korea

Trump will fail

This latest blog post by Martin Armstrong claims trump will fail because he cannot reverse the inevitable.

The cycles of human culture and economics cannot be changed. Whatever happens and whatever individuals do, it must act to bring about the cycles that are inevitable and unstoppable.

The massive debt in western economies, the quantitative easing, the corruption, cronyism … Are all required to make the cycles happen. Humans cannot choose to do otherwise. Whatever we do must fit in with the cycles.

We have no choice. But we can see it as it really is and try to flow with the cycles.

“Will Trump Succeed? No!” https:// http://www.armstrongeco nomics.com/ international-ne ws/politics/ will-trump-succe ed-no/

Trump will fail

Kuril Islands dispute

Russia’s claim over the southwestern island of the kuril islands (Chishima in romanicised Japanese) is offensive and will prevent peace between Japan and Russia until the claim is removed.

The island in question within the terms of this article are, from proximity to Japan:
◾Kunashiri-tō (Russian: Kunashiri Island)
◾Shikotan-tō (Russian: Shikotan Island)
◾Etorofu-tō (Russian: Iturup)

Russia, in claiming these islands, is taking advantage of the defeat of Japan in world war 2, where the USA used nuclear weapons to destroy 2 entire cities of an already defeated nation, for political reasons. Let that crime never be forgotten.

Wikipedia writes on this issue: “The San Francisco Peace Treaty[1] with Japan from 1951 states that Japan must give up all claims to the Kuril Islands,[2]”.

Japan is an island nation and the Japanese will never accept the relinquishment of the northeastern islands off the island of Hokkaido.

Its never going to happen.

It is totally impossible to claim any jurisdiction over these islands and have peace with Japan.

By claiming these island, Russia is offending and provoking the Japanese people and preventing any real peace from being possible.

The most southwestern island (Kunashiri-tō) is crossed by a line joining the 2 most northeasterly points on Hokkaido! Any attempt to claim this island is not Japanese is to incite conflict – it is no less than invasive!

Does Russia want peace with Japan? Or does it want to occupy as much territory as possible? What do you want, Russia?

Russia claims it is a legal acquisition based upon the terms of the end of work war 2, and should not be questioned. Russia puts geopolitical agreements above national acceptance – a mistake never learned from.

The Japanese people have a strong, irreversible claim to these islands.

Wikipedia writes: “Russia began to advance into the Kurils in the early 18th century. Although the Russians often sent expedition parties for research and hunted sea otters, they never went south of Urup island. This was because the Edo Shogunate controlled islands south of Iturup and had guards stationed on those islands to prevent incursions by foreigners.”

Wikipedia writes: “The Treaty of Commerce, Navigation and Delimitation was concluded in 1855, and the border was established between Iturup and Urup. This border confirmed that Japanese territory stretched south from Iturup and Russian territory stretched north of Urup. Sakhalin remained a place where people from both countries could live.”

In light of the geographic situation and the cultures of these 2 nations, I propose an agreement that will nurture peace between these 2 nations:

The 3 large islands near Japan are recognized as 100% Japanese. The island named Urup becomes jointly administered. Nothing can happen on this island that does not have the agreement of both nations. This forces 2 nations that have little desire to meet on a cultural level, to compulsorily meet and negotiate, to derive economic benefit from this island – thereby forcing these two traditionally isolating nations to remain in a situation of constant negotiation – which will prevent them from isolating from each other and amplifying conflict between them.

As long as Russia claims the 3 closest islands to Hokkaido, the Japanese ‘gestalt’ will simply not accept peace with Russia. There will instead remain an underlying conflict that will cause both sides suffering in the long term.

So, Russia, you talk all about peace in Syria. Let the Kuril islands be the measure of your honesty.

Kuril Islands dispute

ABC Australia tries again to discredit recovered memories of child abuse

ABC Australia has in the past published news that discredit memories of child abuse recovered in adulthood.

The article ties to a study done on the susceptibility of young adults to being tricked into accepting imagined experiences as real ones. According to their own description of the study, the participants were interviewed in a way that was likely to cause them to embellish their actual memories, to see if they could be made to believe their own embellishments – Some could.

The journalist writes: “The study from the University of Warwick in the UK surveyed 423 people, and found that 30 per cent could recall things that
had never actually happened to them.”

Well, so can I. I can recall dreams and know they are dreams. I can recall imagining doing things and know that I haven’t done them.

For most adults it is quite easy to distinguish between memories of real events and memories of imagined things. However, young adults are less experienced at distinguishing these and many other things in life – perfect subjects for a study on the reliability of memory.

According to the journalist, the quoted study doesnt address the validity of recovered memories of childhood traumatic experiences at all, but is being heavily pushed as a way to claim that recovered memories are likely false and newly imagined in adulthood.

The article doesn’t even once ask if there is any evidence that recovered memories have a basis in truth. It is a very biased, one sided article with a clear agenda. It only addresses the unreliability of memory.

Well, if memory is so unreliable, how do we manage to get along as we do? We are able to trust and rely on our memories, we couldn’t live as we do without a reliable memory.

Despite trying to discredit recovered memories, the article doesnt mention at all the nature of typically recovered memories, which are not single isolated events in a normal childhood, but a collection of pieces of recollections that support a coherent scenario, and often are associated with people who suffer psychological disturbances that are known to be associated with child abuse.

The ABC enlists the assistance of an Australian memory researcher, Dr. Ecker, who uses the study to push his own agenda about recovered memories being false – which matches the agenda of the ABC.

The purpose of this article is to discredit the survivors of child abuse who claim to have recovered memories of that abuse in adulthood. It serves to assist pedophiles getting away with shocking crimes. I specifically isolate this agenda over more general ones, because of past ABC Australia articles regarding the reliability of memory. They really love to discredit people who claim to have recalled child sexual abuse.

The article also makes a puzzling link with fake news, the current fad in discrediting others, when fake news is about people naively believing what they hear in any media as true – such as Iraq’s WMDs that never existed, but was widely claimed to be true by the ABC and most mainstream media. Such news isn’t related to so-called false memories or this study at all, why make the association? – Unless this ABC article is fake news.

ABC Australia is expected to have a high standard of journalism where one-sided biased articles are unacceptable. But it just parrots the one-sided propaganda we see in most of the establishment-controlled mainstream media.

The only way to see how biased they are is to seek out alternative media and compare their articles about a particular topic or event. Its a mind-opening experience that will destroy any tendency to believe any claim insufficiently supports by evidence.

Share if you like this article.

Source: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-12-16/one-third-can-remember-events-that-never-happened-study/8127954

(ABC has in the past deleted articles about false memory that cause controversy for them)

ABC Australia tries again to discredit recovered memories of child abuse