ABC Australia tries again to discredit recovered memories of child abuse

ABC Australia has in the past published news that discredit memories of child abuse recovered in adulthood.

The article ties to a study done on the susceptibility of young adults to being tricked into accepting imagined experiences as real ones. According to their own description of the study, the participants were interviewed in a way that was likely to cause them to embellish their actual memories, to see if they could be made to believe their own embellishments – Some could.

The journalist writes: “The study from the University of Warwick in the UK surveyed 423 people, and found that 30 per cent could recall things that
had never actually happened to them.”

Well, so can I. I can recall dreams and know they are dreams. I can recall imagining doing things and know that I haven’t done them.

For most adults it is quite easy to distinguish between memories of real events and memories of imagined things. However, young adults are less experienced at distinguishing these and many other things in life – perfect subjects for a study on the reliability of memory.

According to the journalist, the quoted study doesnt address the validity of recovered memories of childhood traumatic experiences at all, but is being heavily pushed as a way to claim that recovered memories are likely false and newly imagined in adulthood.

The article doesn’t even once ask if there is any evidence that recovered memories have a basis in truth. It is a very biased, one sided article with a clear agenda. It only addresses the unreliability of memory.

Well, if memory is so unreliable, how do we manage to get along as we do? We are able to trust and rely on our memories, we couldn’t live as we do without a reliable memory.

Despite trying to discredit recovered memories, the article doesnt mention at all the nature of typically recovered memories, which are not single isolated events in a normal childhood, but a collection of pieces of recollections that support a coherent scenario, and often are associated with people who suffer psychological disturbances that are known to be associated with child abuse.

The ABC enlists the assistance of an Australian memory researcher, Dr. Ecker, who uses the study to push his own agenda about recovered memories being false – which matches the agenda of the ABC.

The purpose of this article is to discredit the survivors of child abuse who claim to have recovered memories of that abuse in adulthood. It serves to assist pedophiles getting away with shocking crimes. I specifically isolate this agenda over more general ones, because of past ABC Australia articles regarding the reliability of memory. They really love to discredit people who claim to have recalled child sexual abuse.

The article also makes a puzzling link with fake news, the current fad in discrediting others, when fake news is about people naively believing what they hear in any media as true – such as Iraq’s WMDs that never existed, but was widely claimed to be true by the ABC and most mainstream media. Such news isn’t related to so-called false memories or this study at all, why make the association? – Unless this ABC article is fake news.

ABC Australia is expected to have a high standard of journalism where one-sided biased articles are unacceptable. But it just parrots the one-sided propaganda we see in most of the establishment-controlled mainstream media.

The only way to see how biased they are is to seek out alternative media and compare their articles about a particular topic or event. Its a mind-opening experience that will destroy any tendency to believe any claim insufficiently supports by evidence.

Share if you like this article.

Source: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-12-16/one-third-can-remember-events-that-never-happened-study/8127954

(ABC has in the past deleted articles about false memory that cause controversy for them)

Advertisements
ABC Australia tries again to discredit recovered memories of child abuse

ABC Australia is a propaganda service

ABC Australia has published a disgusting propaganda piece about residents of Aleppo.

The article claims that residents are tweeting that this is their last message, as Syrian govt forces approach.

But its just one single resident! The rest of the tweets about come from the diacredited white helmets. Rather than revealing how the white helmets are regularly involved in war crimes, the ABC just points out that they won the Nobel peace prize, portraying them as angels.

The article blatantly avoids evidence and spreads unfounded rumors. Biased claims are not supported by any evidence, and the article has no author credited. Most ABC articles quote an author, but the ones I have found to be the worst propaganda dont quote an author.

Thus is not journalism. This is propaganda. The ABC is not a news service, its a disgusting fake news service.

I first began to see the ABC for what it really is when, many years ago, it published propaganda from an organization (FMSF) that tries to discredit survivors of child sexual abuse by saying their recovered memories are false. The article did not present any other point of view except that of the FMSF, despite their charter saying they should. Their past propaganda about child sexual abuse now cannot be accessed or searched. They just show a page that diverts readers to sanitized sources, and effectively wash their hands of all the pro-pedophile propaganda they have published.

I have since observed countless examples of propaganda from Australia’s ABC. Yet so many Australians rely on it as their only source of news. These Australians are totally brainwashed.

The Australian government should cease all financial support of the ABC. Taxpayers should not be paying for fake news.

Source: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-12-13/aleppo-residents-post-goodbye-messages-to-social-media/8117792

ABC Australia is a propaganda service

Socialist Oxfam attacks Ireland for low tax rates

Oxfam, a politically motivated socialist ‘charity’, has twisted low national tax rates into criminal tax haven status.

This is attacking an individual country’s right to economical survival. Countries like Ireland have low tax rates to attract businesses and keep their country economically alive. By doing so, citizens have more job opportunities and a higher standard of living than they would if that country had to match the tax rates of Europe or the USA.

Europe and USA are now desperate for more tax revenue, because their establishments have overspent and over borrowed against their citizens ability to pay tax. Now they are faced with defaulting on debt obligations and losing power. So they are trying to take higher tax contributions. They will do anything to stay in power, even start wars.

Those countries that have lower tax rates are now being accused of criminal behavior. Political organizations like Oxfam are being used as political weapons, to tarnish the status of lower taxes, by accusing them of participating in crimes like money laundering and helping companies avoid paying tax. But this is a lie.

These things happen in all countries, and its not because of low tax rates, it’s what organized crime does.

Businesses have the right to move to countries that have lower tax rates. Just as individuals do.

Regarding the crimes Oxfam is accusing Ireland of, I suggest that diplomatic immunity is used heavily for organized crime and money laundering. Its an essential tool for the establishments of the world to engage in drug running, money laundering, gun running and child prostitution.

Rather than attacking countries that have low tax rates for their economic survival, lets expose the criminal reasons for raising taxes and the mechanisms that the establishment uses to commit crime.

Socialist Oxfam attacks Ireland for low tax rates

The Left’s Anti Christian Hypocrisy

America brings us another example of systemic anti-christian sentiment.

The ACLU is helping Knightstown, Indiana resident Joseph Tomkins sue the town of Knightstown, because it has placed a religious cross at the top of a Christmas tree.

Tomkins says he objects to his tax dollars going to pay for putting up a religious symbol.

But, hypocritically, he doesn’t have any problem demanding other peoples tax dollars be paid to him for damages.

This gives his lawsuit away as having a political, anti christian agenda. If you dont like the government erecting christian symbols, then complain about that, be direct and honest. But then why not get straight to the point and complain about pedophile priests? That’s an association I make with the Christian church.

He hasn’t done this because he has a hidden agenda.

Also the ACLU recently helped the Church of Satan sue another local government over a nativity display on government land.

I suggest that he ACLU has a secret agenda of supporting Satanism, and the child ritual sexual abuse and human sacrifice that goes with it.

Source: http://www.indystar.com/story/news/2016/12/09/aclu-sues-knightstown-over-christmas-cross-display/95197638/

The Left’s Anti Christian Hypocrisy

The left thought they had us on side

The political left – socialists – totally thought they had most of us supports their point of view and proposed solutions for the future. They really believed that. They are genuinely shocked by the results of recent elections, where non-socialist parties have upset the socialist establishment.

The problem is that they took our silence as agreement. But our silence was the consequence of intimidation. We were made to feel pressured, we were even attacked for our views. So we mostly kept silent – until the next election, where we could vote for people who expressed some of what we feel.

That’s one funny thing about socialists – they think we appreciate being corrected and forced to accept a view we dont agree with. Socialists dont get this, yet they are so certain they know better how to run our society.

Socialists are stupid.

Socialists are so certain they are right, they can force us to live as they dictate. Yet they never learn from historical examples of the application of their solutions. The historical outcome of socialism is national failure, economic destruction and mass murder.
But, no, they are sure this time it is different, this time forcing their way on us will have a good outcome, and we will be so grateful and love them.

The left thought they had us on side

California electoral college voting challenge

The USA political establishment continues to show I is terrified of the effect Trump may have on their hold on power.

Vinz Koller joins other electoral college electors in California and other US states, filing a lawsuit against laws that force them to vote for the candidate chosen in the popular vote.

The reality is that these people aren’t happy with how Americans voted, and insist on disrespecting their vote – thereby attacking democracy – while claiming to support democracy.

A democracy where the citizens choice doesn’t have to be respected, doesn’t have to be accepted by the establishment, is not a democracy – its a glorified totalitarian opinion poll.

Michael Baca, a California elector, speaking to Salon. “My whole message regarding the Hamilton Electors has been unification of Americans.”

Baca is claiming that by rejecting the popular vote, saying to Americans they are wrong, untrustworthy, is supportive of the unification of Americans. Clearly he is only talking about the Americans that matter to him – the corrupt establishment.

Source: https://sputniknews.com/politics/201612111048414738-california-elector-files-suit/

California electoral college voting challenge

The duty to be energy efficient

In the battle between those participating in the greatest scientific scam ever, and those who oppose it, an important issue is being totally ignored.

Supporters of human-caused global warming are raking in cash from government subsidies and enjoying political influence beyond their wildest dreams. They oppose the use of fossil fuels because it releases CO2, which they say is causing global warming. They are even trying to prevent the worlds poor from using fossil fuels, the only energy source they can actually afford.

On the other side, some of those who oppose the global warming scam try to talk up the benefits of using fossil fuels, and are sometimes as unscientific and ridiculous as the warmists, by talking up the benefits of rising CO2 for such things as agriculture yields.

The reality is that the available evidence cannot show that humans are responsible for rising CO2 levels.

In this battle for short term personal gain, really fundamental long term issues of the survival of the human species are almost completely ignored.

The unmentioned and sensible goal is to leave as much non-renewable resources as possible for future generations, so they can use those resources to invest in the long term survival of our species.

The rich west can now afford to be more efficient, develop more efficient ways of doing things, so as to use less energy. They got this way by using cheap fossil fuel energy and creating wealth.

Yet there is so much poverty in the world. The poor cant yet afford to be more efficient. They must first use fossil fuels to raise their wealth enough to then become more efficient. They wont be able to rise up without fossil fuels, so they must first use it before they can then be more efficient with it.

The fastest way to reduce the global use of fossil files is to allow poor nations to use fossil fuels to grow enough wealth to achieve the capacity to use less fossil fuels.

The duty to be energy efficient